Florida Voters Registration » Really

Is It Really Racist For The Black Vote To Be Going To Obama?

admin — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:46:35 +0000

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presid…

(check voter demographics near bottom)
Clinton 83% to Bush 10% in 1992…84% Clinton to 12% Dole in 1996
I can’t find demographic breakdown for 2000; all articles seem to focus on the Florida fiasco.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stat…
(check Voter Demographics near bottom)
88% of black vote went to John Kerry; 11% went to Bush.
Based on this info, it would suggest to me that black voters just seem to go Democrat anyway; basically meaning if Obama had been fully white (said only because I know that half-black attack is coming) he would probably still have taken a sizable chunk of the black vote. At least in the 80% and above range.
I have no doubt that some are voting for him solely on his being black. But overall it would seem to me that majority are going to him because he’s Democrat.

Can Obama Really Win?

admin — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:47:59 +0000

Polling Methods May Tilt Obama Results, Exec Says
Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:31 PM
By: Ron Kessler Article Font Size
Most polls may be overstating Barack Obama’s support by 5 to 10 percentage points because those surveyed may not be telling the truth about voting for him, ad executive Gabe Joseph III tells Newsmax.
It is possible that, when live callers ask for a respondent’s name, the individual is more likely to say he will vote for Obama, says Joseph, president of ccAdvertising, which conducts polls for a range of candidates and members of Congress. When automated dialers do the polling, respondents are more likely to give an honest answer because they think of the poll as being anonymous.
“I believe the traditional pollsters, when they ask your name, institute a bias,” Joseph says. “We never ask anybody who they are. We do not have to. The only personal identification we obtain comes at the end of the survey when we ask about gender and age.”
The difference is apparent when automated pollster results are compared with traditional polls that ask the individual’s name, he says. In many circles, particularly within the traditional Democrat base, it is politically incorrect to tell a pollster the respondent will not vote for Obama, he says.
“It’s very difficult to ask a question about race and get an accurate answer,” Joseph says. “People are concerned that their name is going to get out. So the only way that we’ve been able to track it, is to actually do surveys where the respondent is not identified before elections, before primaries. If you do one beforehand, you can look at the difference and you see what’s really happening.”
The clearest example of the disparity was in the Democratic primary in New Hampshire. The polls showed Obama running ahead of Hillary Clinton by up to 13 points. When the returns came in, Obama had lost by three points to his fellow Democrat.
The phenomenon has been dubbed the Bradley Effect, first identified in a 1982 California gubernatorial election. Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley was the supposed front-runner in an open race. Polls showed the African-American Democrat running well ahead of white Republican candidate George Deukmejian. Yet, when the returns came in, Bradley lost by more than 50,000 votes.
To be sure, when it comes to Obama, not every primary election validated the Bradley Effect. But now, in every state ccAdvertising is tracking, Joseph has discerned “a 5-point to 10-point difference” between the number of respondents who say they will vote for Obama when asked anonymously, compared with results when pollsters request their names.
In ccAdvertising’s most recent poll on Sept. 7, the company surveyed 130,000 homes in 13 targeted states. Overall, 48.5 percent of the respondents said they would vote for McCain, compared with 40.2 percent for Obama, a difference of 8.3 percentage points. Of the respondents, 11.3 percent said they had no preference.
The results showed a decrease in support for Obama of 4.9 percent and an increase in support for McCain of 6.3 percent over a previous poll taken before the conventions.
McCain won 11 of the states surveyed with 149 electoral votes: Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.
Obama won two of the states surveyed with 86 electoral votes: California and New York

Did Ann Coulter Really Vote For Tom Foley?

admin — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:43:54 +0000

I remember reading that she actually broke some voter districting laws in Florida so that she could cast her vote for Foley. Remember Foley, the gay Republican pedophile who is hiding out in rehab?

Can Obama Really Win A General Election???

admin — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:43:41 +0000

Obama has won almost all Republican states in the primary. These states WILL go to McCain in the general election. Hillary has won the Democratic AND swing states like Ohio and Florida. You CANNOT win a general election without winning Ohio and Florida!!!!
How can Obama win a general election……
He CAN’T!!! IMO

Who Really Voted For Bush In The Last Prez Election??

admin — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:48:12 +0000

If the election were held only for people makng $50,000/year or less, John Kerry would have whipped George Bush 55%-45%. In fact, if it were held only for people making $100,000/year or less, John Kerry still would have beaten George Bush, 51%-49%.
No, that’s not just a regional dynamic. No, poor people still don’t elect Republicans in red states. Bush lost the South (49%-50%), the Midwest (44%-56%), and the West (47%-52%) among voters making $50,000/year or less. If only people making $50,000/year or less had voted, John Kerry would have picked up Mississippi, Georgia, North Carolina, Florida, Arkansas, and Virginia, and Louisiana and South Carolina would have been too close to call.
(Election data thanks to CNN Election 2004 Exit Polls.)

Is That Really Tom Gallaghers Hair?

admin — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:11:11 +0000

Thsi guy running for the Republican ticket for Gov in Florida is a moron. Christ should win but this other retard Tom, looks like a bad car salesman. Please please please dont let him win or we are in trouble. Does anyone know if thats really his hair?

Does It Really Make Sense That The President, School Principals & Teachers Would Brainwash Our Children?

admin — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:46:48 +0000

I mean, REALLY? The loving father of two school-aged children would say or do something inappropriate for other people’s children in a presidential talk? He would “claim” that he’s going to talk about doing well in school, but then he would start to talk about health care reform, bank bailouts, and passing legislation–to FIVE-year-olds?? REALLY??
And the teachers and principals all over America would stand idly by and allow this to happen–indeed, volunteer for it to happen? REALLY?
You might find this interesting, especially the part about Daddy Bush:http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/…

Do We Really Need To Drill Off Shore?

admin — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:45:37 +0000

As for other locations, George Will pointed out in his column the other day that oil is being drilled right now 60 miles off the coast of Florida. But we’re not doing it, the Chinese are, in cooperation with the Cuban government. Even the communists have figured out that a good answer to high prices is more supply.
Mother Jones and the Gavel note that Reps. John Boehner (R-OH) and Roy Blunt (R-MO) have uttered the same talking points. It’s false. And they’re being called out on it by a conservative senator who knows more about the issue than they do.
Armed with maps and reports, Sen. Mel Martinez – a Florida Republican who served in Bush’s cabinet – took to the Senate floor to dispute Cheney’s claim:
Despite what is cited as fact here in the Senate and in other places, China is not drilling off the coast of Cuba. … Reports to the contrary are simply false. So any talk of using some fabricated China/Cuba connection as an argument to change U.S. policy, in my view, has no merit

Are Republicans Really Going To Ask For An Apology From Alan Grayson?

admin — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:51:43 +0000

“If you get sick, America, the Republican health care plan is this: die quickly,” Florida Democrat Alan Grayson stated during a speech to the House of Representatives last night. In the speech, Grayson pulled out a series of signs describing the Republican plan as “don’t get sick,” then proposed that if you do get sick, the party would like you to die quickly… Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., has announced plans to introduce a “resolution of disapproval” similar to the one passed against Wilson to condemn Grayson’s behavior.http://slatest.slate.com/id/2231055/entr…
really?? After all the death panel stuff they are going to object to this?

Does It Really Make Sense That The President, School Principals & Teachers Would Brainwash Our Children?

admin — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:51:36 +0000